insulating UK houses |Political parties and research organisations are putting more pressure on the UK government to increase funding for house insulation since studies indicate that doing so might result in energy cost savings of billions of pounds.
In an effort to lessen the burden on people’s wallets and the environment, the Institute of Public Policy Research (IPPR) has developed a 28-year plan to implement energy-saving residential modifications across the nation at a cost of £7 billion year. They assert that the decision is “uniquely positioned” to serve as “the cornerstone of the government’s leveling-up plan in England.”
According to the IPPR, all 24 million homes in England require renovation, lagging “far behind” its neighbours in Europe like Germany and France.
When energy costs are limited at £2,500 this fall, the think tank claims that investing in its proposed multibillion-dollar retrofitting programme could save typical homes £430 annually and provide more than 1.2 million direct employment and 1.5 million indirect jobs by 2050.
According to the IPPR, the programme might generate goal more than 61,200 new direct jobs in the North East, or more than 5% of the region’s entire labour force.
With just under 139,000 additional direct jobs comprising little more than 2% of all employment in the city, this would, according to the report, represent a substantially bigger gain than the increase recorded in London.
This plea for more funding for house insulation has also been echoed by other business and scientific organisations. Energy and Climate Intelligence Unit (ECIU): The government’s 2013 decision to cut support for home insulation means 10 million households have missed out on improvements insulating UK houses that would have reduced their energy demand. The Energy Efficiency Infrastructure Group (EEIG), a business coalition, has urged Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng to invest £5 billion more to insulate UK buildings.
The Treasury and taxpayers would have saved almost £9 billion in the first year of the energy price guarantee, which caps home fuel bills to protect against rising costs, and £18 billion over two years if prices continue high, according to ECIU, had the adjustments been enacted.
According to the report, the UK is only putting in less than a tenth of the measures necessary in its “cold, damp, and leaky” housing stock to reach its net zero goal. The rate of deployment is also expected to pick up in light of the “dire” energy price situation.
A nationwide retrofitting programme, according to IPPR, would call for actions such as establishing a deadline for the phase-out of the sale of oil and gas boilers, creating a “one-stop shop” for financial support, launching a “massive national information campaign,” and increasing funding to local governments so they can implement projects in their jurisdictions.
“This paper demonstrates how a nationwide retrofit programme may foster job creation, economic expansion, and levelling up at the same time. In addition, it would cut carbon emissions, energy consumption, and our reliance on (Russian President Vladimir) Putin, according to Luke Murphy, assistant director for the IPPR’s energy, climate, housing, and infrastructure division.
It’s difficult to imagine any intervention that might accomplish so many goals at once. It’s time for the government to take action and make investments in modernising our country’s housing stock to make them warmer and more affordable.
insulating UK houses Making homes more energy-efficient could result in savings of £20 billion over the next five years, which would benefit consumers and lessen the amount of government borrowing required to cap energy prices, according to a letter to the Chancellor from the EEIG, which also includes the CBI and the industry group Energy UK.
The EEIG recommended spending an additional £2 billion to “supercharge” current programmes for low-income families and investing £3 billion over the following three years in a new energy efficiency programme to assist insulate up to two million more houses.
According to Sarah Kostense-Winterton, the EEIG chairperson, “Energy efficiency is a triple-win for the economy, energy security, and improving Britain’s health.” “The Chancellor has the chance to invest in saving the public purse billions of pounds through straightforward energy-saving initiatives that may dramatically reduce home costs.”
The demand for better infrastructure surrounding house insulation is not new. Sir Keir Starmer, the leader of Labour, reaffirmed his proposal for a nationwide scheme to insulate 19 million houses last month, claiming it would save families an average of £1,000 annually. The plan was initially put out in September 2021.
He said, “We require a federal mission to insulate homes. We would have the equivalent of two million houses insulated if the administration had acted on my request from a year ago.
Chris Stark, the chairman of the UK’s Climate Change Committee, previously told the BBC that he thought the government’s insulation programme was “quite weak.”
The housing stock in Britain is commonly cited as being among the oldest and least energy-efficient in all of Europe. Retrofitting, or insulating already-built homes, may be highly pricey. Stark feels that not enough is being done by the government to help pay for this expensive project.
According to him, the government must offer “a greater incentive for the majority of people to make these investments in enhancing the energy efficiency of the home that they live in.”
“We wholeheartedly agree that retrofitting homes provides opportunities for economic growth and will help bring down household energy bills, which is why we are spending £6.6bn in this parliament to improve energy efficiency of homes across the country,” a Business, Energy, and Industrial Strategy Department (BEIS) spokesperson said.
The majority of our “Help to Heat” assistance is directed toward low-income and vulnerable households, aiding tens of thousands of homes and generating annual energy bill savings of, on average, £300. With 46% of houses now having an energy efficiency grade of C or above, up from 14% in 2010, there has already been significant improvement.
Comments are closed